CASE UPDATE: Accents and harassment

30th January 2025

Employment law, Newbury, Berkshire.

A recent Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) case has highlighted that making comments about someone’s accent, such as saying it’s hard to understand, can sometimes be considered unlawful racial harassment.

In Carozzi v University of Hertfordshire,  {High Court Judgment Template} the employee (the Claimant) accused her employer (the Respondent) of several types of discrimination and harassment with 36 separate detriments or less favourable treatment. Some of her claims focused on comments made about her strong Brazilian accent. Initially, the first employment tribunal dismissed all her claims. However, the Claimant appealed to the EAT, arguing that:

  1. Accent and Ethnic Origin: She believed the comments about her accent were connected to her ethnic origin (being Brazilian and Jewish), even if those making the comments weren’t influenced by her ethnicity when they made the comments.
  2. Victimisation: She had claimed her employer refused to share a document (meeting notes) because they were worried she might use it to make a discrimination claim. Employees are protected from “victimisation” which is being treated less favourably because they have raised issues of potential discrimination. The tribunal had dismissed this claim on the basis that the employer would have withheld the document if they had been worried that the employee might make another legal claim (one which was not for discrimination) so there was no less favourable treatment. The Claimant argued this was wrong.

The EAT agreed with the Claimant and allowed her appeal. Here’s why:

  1. Accent and race are linked: The EAT considered that comments about someone’s accent can be ‘related to’ their ethnic origin - it doesn’t matter if the person making the comment wasn’t influenced by their ethnic origin in making the comments.
  2. Refusing to share documents can be victimisation: If an employer refuses to share a document because they fear it might be used in a discrimination case, this could amount to victimisation. The EAT said the tribunal was wrong to dismiss this claim and the real question was whether the refusal to provide the notes was influenced, at least partly, by concerns about a possible discrimination claim.  

What action should businesses take? 

  • Training: Remind employees to be cautious and respectful about comments on accents—they can easily cross the line into harassment, especially if the accent is tied to a person’s race or nationality.
  • Transparency: Be aware that withholding documents out of fear they might lead to legal claims could lead to victimisation complaints.

 

If you need any help with the issues raised in this article or any HR issues generally, please contact us at hello@fentonelliott.co.uk

Back to news

Why Choose Us?

Reasons why clients choose Fenton Elliott to represent them and get the results they expect.

More about us
Simon Fenton

Contact Us Today

If you are looking for employment or family law advice we can help. We will respond quickly to all enquiries.

Contact us